Balance and Ankle Range of Motion in Community-Dwelling Women Aged 64 to 87 Years: A Correlational Study

Aside

Balance and Ankle Range of Motion in Community-Dwelling Women Aged 64 to 87 Years: A Correlational Study

Background and Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between balance measures and ankle range of motion (ROM) in community-dwelling elderly women with no health problems. Identifi- cation of modifiable factors associated with balance may enable clinicians to design treatments to help reduce the risk of falls in elderly people.

Subjects: The sample consisted of 34 women between the ages of 64 and 87 years.

Methods: Goniometry was used to determine bilateral ankle active-assistive range of motion (AAROM) and passive range of motion. Balance capabilities were measured with the Functional Reach Test (FRT) and the Tinetti Performance-Ori- ented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Balance data for the FRT, POMA balance subtest, POMA gait subtest, and POMA total score were correlated with ankle ROM using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (PCC).

Results: Correlations between ROM and balance scores were found, ranging from .29 to .63. The POMA gait subtest and FRT resulted in higher correlations with ROM than did the POMA balance subtest (left total AAROM PCC=.63, .51, and .31). Correlations using composite ankle ROM scores were higher than individual motions. The strongest correlation existed between bilat- eral, total ankle AAROM and the POMA gait subtest scores (PCC=.63)

Conclusion and Discussion: Correlations exist between ankle ROM and balance in community-dwelling elderly women. Additional research is needed to determine whether treatment directed at increasing ankle ROM can improve balance. [Mecagni C, Smith JP, Roberts KE, O’Sullivan SB. Balance and ankle range of motion in community- dwelling women aged 64 to 87 years: a correlational study. Phys Ther. 2000;80:1004 –1011.]

Full Article

Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)

Aside

Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)

The MSFC is a three-part, standardized, quantitative, assessment instrument for use in clinical studies, particularly clinical trials, of MS. (Cutter et al, 1999) It was developed by a special Task Force on Clinical Outcomes Assessment that had been appointed by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society’s Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. (Whitaker et al, 1995; Rudick et al, 1996) It was the consensus of the task force that important clinical dimensions not emphasized in existing rating scales, e.g. cognition, should be measured. The MSFC was designed to fulfill three criteria:

  1. It should be multidimensional to reflect the varied clinical expression of MS across patients and over time
  2. The dimensions should change relatively independently over time
  3. One component should be a measure of cognitive function. The three components of the MSFC measure leg function/ambulation, arm/hand function, and cognitive function.

Administration Time

Administration time will vary depending upon the ability of the patient. Total administration time for all three measures should be approximately 20-30 minutes.

Administration Method

The MSFC measures are administered in person by a trained examiner. The examiner need not be a physician or nurse.

Scoring

The MSFC can produce scores for each of the three individual measures as well as a composite score. In addition, there are a variety of ways to calculate scores depending on the nature of the study and sample.

General Comments

The three component measures of the MSFC had been used for some time in MS prior to their being combined into a composite measure. Analysis of data from studies using these measures had pointed to their reliability, validity, and sensitivity. As a set of objective, quantitative assessment instruments, the MSFC represents a methodological advance over the ordinal clinical rating scales that have been used in MS in the past, e.g., the EDSS and Ambulation Index. A three-part instrument offering both separate and composite scores, the MSFC provides a versatile assessment method for investigational purposes with the ability to measure patients at various levels of disability, i.e., ambulation at less disabled levels of the EDSS, arm function at more disabled levels, and cognitive function at all levels. Since its introduction, the MSFC has seen increasing use in both clinical trials and other clinical studies.

Psychometric Properties

All three measures making up the MSFC have been shown to have good inter-rater and test-retest reliability. In addition, there is considerable evidence for their validity and sensitivity to clinically relevant change in MS patients. However, performance on the MSFC is sensitive to practice effects, that is, patients often display poorer performance when first tested due to lack of familiarity with the tasks. It is recommended that three or four administrations be given prior to a baseline assessment if accurate (rather than comparative) assessments of change over time are needed. Refer to the discussion of the individual components of the MSFC for further details concerning their psychometric properties.

http://www.nationalmssociety.org/for-professionals/researchers/clinical-study-measures/msfc/index.aspx

Gait Pathologies – Possible Causes

Aside

Was working with a patient today on her gait and I needed to look up the 30 Foot Walk Test. While I was on google I ended up looking at some of the other links that came up under the search. I found this nice chart from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Review that lists gait abnormalities followed by possible causes. I think it’s a great resource for trouble-shooting gait changes. Gait Pathology Chart

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Aside

ICD 9

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is a disorder caused by problems in the inner ear. Its symptoms are repeated episodes of positional vertigo, that is, of a spinning sensation caused by changes in head position.

Dizziness accounts for about 6 million clinic visits in the U.S. every year, and 17–42% of these patients eventually are diagnosed with BPPV.

Within the labyrinth of the inner ear lie collections of calcium crystals known as otoconia. In patients with BPPV, the otoconia are dislodged from their usual position within the utricle and they migrate over time into one of the semicircular canals (the posterior canal is most commonly affected due to its anatomical position). When the head is reoriented relative to gravity, the gravity-dependent movement of the heavier otoconial debris within the affected semicircular canal causes abnormal (pathological) fluid endolymph displacement and a resultant sensation of vertigo. This more common condition is known as canalithiasis. In rare cases, the crystals themselves can adhere to a semicircular canal cupula rendering it heavier than the surrounding endolymph. Upon reorientation of the head relative to gravity, the cupula is weighted down by the dense particles thereby inducing an immediate and maintained excitation of semicircular canal afferent nerves. This condition is termed cupulolithiasis.

It can be triggered by any action which stimulates the posterior semi-circular canal which may include tilting the head, rolling over in bed, ooking up or under or sudden head motions.

The condition is diagnosed from patient history (feeling of vertigo with sudden changes in positions); and by performing the Dix-Hallpike maneuver or Horizontal Roll Test which are diagnostic for the condition. The test involves a reorientation of the head to align the canal with the direction of gravity. This test stimulus is effective in provoking the symptoms in subjects suffering from archetypal BPPV. These symptoms are typically a short lived vertigo, and observed nystagmus. If symptoms do not resolves within 8-10 seconds, this is a positive test for cupulolithiasis (symptoms typically are delated and last more than a minute).

The most effective treatments for relieving symptoms of BPPV include the Epley Maneuver (for anterior and posterior canalithiasis/cupulolithiasis), or the Appiani Maneuver (less common include the BBQ Roll and the Brandt-Daroff) (for horizontal canalithiasis/cupulolithiasis). The Epley and Appiani employ gravity to move the calcium build-up that causes the condition. This particle repositioning maneuver can be performed during a clinic visit by specially trained physical therapists. The maneuver is relatively simple but few general health practitioners know how to perform it. The Epley maneuver does not address the actual presence of the particles (otoconia), rather it changes their location. The maneuver moves these particles from areas in the inner ear which cause symptoms, such as vertigo, and repositions them into areas where they do not cause these problems.

Dix Hallpike (tests for anterior and posterior canalithiasis)
Horizontal Roll Test (tests for horizontal canalithiasis)
Epley Manuver (anterior and posterior canal BPPV)
Appiani Maneuver (horizontal canal BPPV)
BPPV PT Treatment Flowsheet
Vestibular Anatomy.

Meclizine is a commonly prescribed medication, but is ultimately ineffective for this condition, other than masking the dizziness. Other sedative medications help mask the symptoms associated with BPPV but do not affect the disease process or resolution rate. Betahistine (trade name Serc) is available in some countries and is commonly prescribed but again it is likely ineffective. Particle repositioning remains the current gold standard treatment for most cases of BPPV.

Surgical treatments, such as a semi-circular canal occlusion, do exist for BPPV but carry the same risk as any neurosurgical procedure. Surgery is reserved for severe and persistent cases which fail particle repositioning and medical therapy.

Supporting Research

Clinical practice guideline: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo – contains excellent diagrams of maneuvers

Dizziness and Balance – website with lots of excellent information.

Modified Physical Performance Test

Aside

Modified Physical Performance Test

Testing Protocol: Administer the test as outlined below. Subjects are given up to two chances to complete each item. Assistive devices are permitted for tasks 6 – 9.

1. Standing Static Balance
• Feet together: “Stand still with your feet together as demonstrated for 10 seconds.”
• Semi Tandem: “Stand with the heel of one foot placed to the side of the 1st toe of the opposite foot for 10 seconds.” Subject chooses which foot goes forward.
• Tandem: “Stand with the heel of one foot directly in front of the other foot, for 10 seconds. Subject chooses which foot goes forward.

2. Chair Rise: Use a straight back chair with a solid seat that is 16” high. Ask participant to sit on the chair with arms folded across their chest. “Stand up and sit down as quickly as possible 5 times, keeping your arms folded across your chest.” Stop timing when the participant stands the 5th time.

3. Book Lift: Place a Physician’s Desk Reference Book (1988 PDR: 5.5 lbs) or other heavy book on a table in front of the patient. Ask the patient, when given the command “go” to place the book, as quickly as they can, on a shelf above shoulder level. Time from the command “go” until when the book is resting on the shelf. Starting position is with their hands at their side.

4. Put on and remove a jacket: If the subject has a jacket or cardigan sweater, ask them to remove it. If not, give the subject a lab coat. Ask the subject, on the command “go” to quickly put the coat on completely such that it is straight on their shoulders and then remove the garment completely. Time from the command “go” until the garment has been completely removed. Hint: it is more accurate to time putting on the garment, then pause (pause the stopwatch), then time taking off the garment.

5. Pick up a penny from floor: Place a penny approximately 12 inches from the patient’s foot on the dominant side. Ask the patient, on the command “go” to pick up the penny from the floor and stand up. This is to be done as quickly as they can; yet allowing for safety and comfort. Time from the command “go” until the subject is standing erect with a penny in hand. If dexterity is a problem, a pen or similar lightweight object can be used

6. Turn 360 degrees: Ask the subject to turn 360 degrees “as quickly as you can, as you feel comfortable and safe”. Evaluate using the scale on PPT scoring sheet. Additional data: count the number of steps required.

7. 50-foot walk test: Bring subject to start on a 50 foot walk test course (25 feet out and 25 feet back) and ask the subject, on the command “go” to walk as quickly as they can to the 25-foot mark and back. Time from the command “go” until the starting line is crossed on the way back.

8. Stairs: Take vital signs. Bring subject to foot of stairs (nine to 12 steps) and ask subject, on the command ”go” to begin climbing up to a total of 4 flights stairs (as quickly as they can, as they feel comfortable and safe) or until they feel tired and wish to stop. Before beginning this task, alert the subject to the possibility of developing chest pain or shortness of breath and inform the subject to tell you if any of these symptoms occur. You will walk with the subject. Time from the command “go” until the subjects’ first foot reaches the top of the first flight of stairs. Go on to record the number of flights (maximum is four) completed (up and down is one flight). Provide a chair for resting when completed, so vital signs can be taken immediately post.

Scoring: 32/36 – 36/36 = not frail
25/36 – 31/36 = mild frailty 17/36 – 24/36 = moderate frailty
< 17/36 = unlikely to be able to function in the community

Brown, M., Sinacore, D.R. (2005). Physical and Performance Measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M350-5

Modified Physical Performance Test Instructions
Modified Physical Performance Test Score Sheet

Dynamic Gait Index

Aside

Dynamic Gait Index Score Sheet
(Adapted from Shumway-Cook & Woollacott Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications, 1995)

 
1. Gait level surface _____
Instructions: Walk at your normal speed from here to the next mark (20’)
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Walks 20’, no assistive devices, good speed, no evidence for imbalance, normal gait pattern.
(2) Mild Impairment: Walks 20’, uses assistive devices, slower speed, mild gait deviations.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Walks 20’, slow speed, abnormal gait pattern, evidence for imbalance.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot walk 20’ without assistance, severe gait deviations or imbalance.

 
2. Change in gait speed _____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace (for 5’), when I tell you “go,” walk as fast as you can (for 5’). When I tell you “slow,” walk as slowly as you can (for 5’).
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Able to smoothly change walking speed without loss of balance or gait deviation. Shows a significant difference in walking speeds
between normal, fast and slow speeds.
(2) Mild Impairment: Is able to change speed but demonstrates mild gait deviations, or no gait deviations but is unable to achieve a significant
change in velocity, or uses an assistive device.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Makes only minor adjustments to walking speed, or accomplishes a change in speed with significant gait deviations, or
changes speed but loses significant gait deviations, or changes speed but loses balance but is able to recover and continue walking.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot change speeds, or loses balance and has to reach for wall or be caught.

 
3. Gait with horizontal head turns _____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell you to “look right,” keep walking straight, but turn your head to the right. Keep looking to the right until I tell you, “look left,” then keep walking straight and turn your head to the left. Keep your head to the left until I tell you “look straight,“ then keep walking straight, but return your head to the center.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Performs head turns smoothly with no change in gait.
(2) Mild Impairment: Performs head turns smoothly with slight change in gait velocity, i.e., minor disruption to smooth gait path or uses walking aid.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Performs head turns with moderate change in gait velocity, slows down, staggers but recovers, can continue to walk.
(0) Severe Impairment: Performs task with severe disruption of gait, i.e., staggers, outside 15” path, loses balance, stops, reaches for wall.

 
4. Gait with vertical head turns _____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell you to “look up,” keep walking straight, but tip your head up. Keep looking up until I tell you, “look down,” then keep walking straight and tip your head down. Keep your head down until I tell you “look straight,“ then keep walking straight, but return your head to the center.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Performs head turns smoothly with no change in gait.
(2) Mild Impairment: Performs task with slight change in gait velocity, i.e., minor disruption to smooth gait path or uses walking aid.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Performs task with moderate change in gait velocity, slows down, staggers but recovers, can continue to walk.
(0) Severe Impairment: Performs task with severe disruption of gait, i.e., staggers, outside 15” path, loses balance, stops, reaches for wall.

 
5. Gait and pivot turn _____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell you, “turn and stop,” turn as quickly as you can to face the opposite direction and stop.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Pivot turns safely within 3 seconds and stops quickly with no loss of balance.
(2) Mild Impairment: Pivot turns safely in > 3 seconds and stops with no loss of balance.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Turns slowly, requires verbal cueing, requires several small steps to catch balance following turn & stop.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot turn safely, requires assistance to turn and stop.

 
6. Step over obstacle ____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal speed. When you come to the shoebox, step over it, not around it, and keep walking.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Is able to step over the box without changing gait speed, no evidence of imbalance.
(2) Mild Impairment: Is able to step over box, but must slow down and adjust steps to clear box safely.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Is able to step over box but must stop, then step over. May require verbal cueing.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot perform without assistance.

 
7. Step around obstacles _____
Instructions: Begin walking at normal speed. When you come to the first cone (about 6’ away), walk around the right side of it. When you come to the
second cone (6’ past first cone), walk around it to the left.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Is able to walk around cones safely without changing gait speed; no evidence of imbalance.
(2) Mild Impairment: Is able to step around both cones, but must slow down and adjust steps to clear cones.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Is able to clear cones but must significantly slow speed to accomplish task, or requires verbal cueing.
(0) Severe Impairment: Unable to clear cones, walks into one or both cones, or requires physical assistance.

 
8. Steps _____
Instructions: Walk up these stairs as you would at home, i.e., using the railing if necessary. At the top, turn around and walk down.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Alternating feet, no rail.
(2) Mild Impairment: Alternating feet, must use rail.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Two feet to a stair, must use rail.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot do safely.

 
TOTAL SCORE: ___ / 24

 
Scoring Information:
21/24 or above = minimal to no risk for falls
Below 21 indicates risk for falls and the lower the score the more the risk
Common score for moderate stage Parkinson Disease = 9-11/24.